Thursday, May 30, 2013
June is Dairy Month…Read about Trending in Profit Margins
As Americans become increasingly concerned about the negative health effects of certain foods or food ingredients, manufacturers are introducing a greater variety of healthier products. This includes lower-sugar flavored milks and reduced-fat cultured products.
This move has expanded profit margins throughout the food industry because health-conscious consumers are generally willing to pay more for food that they believe is healthy for them. (Think Greek yogurt.) In particular, large companies that have been providing Americans with foods for years have established brand loyalty, so when they introduce healthier, more-expensive products, they typically do not experience significant declines in demand for their products because people view them as high-quality brands, according to a recent report from IBISWorld Inc. As such, these companies can realize higher profit margins than companies that do not have well-established brands.
According to the report, food processors must purchase a variety of commodities, such as feed, corn, milk, wheat and sugar, to produce their goods. The prices of these commodities help determine how processors in a variety of food industries price their goods. So when the price of a commodity fluctuates rapidly from year to year, the cost of manufacturing products becomes volatile. (The dairy industry knows this very well.)
Volatility, in turn, leaves processors less able to anticipate cost increases. They will often pass these costs on to consumers in the form of higher product prices, or, as in the case of ice cream, by reducing package size. Although this move does not bode well for consumers, many will still pay the higher prices, or accept the smaller package, especially for foods that are staples in their diets. Processors end up benefiting because the higher input prices aren’t eating into their profit margins, while demand from consumers stays steady.
And here’s some good news on commodity prices. They are expected to be less volatile during the next five years, which presents even more opportunity for processors to expand their profit margins, according to IBISWorld. Most notable is the price of corn, which is an input in all 10 of the most profitable food industries identified by IBISWorld, one of which is ice cream. (See table.)
During the five years to 2018, the price of corn is anticipated to decline at an annualized rate of 2.6% to $5.71 per bushel, reversing its 6.7% annualized ascent from the past five years. Consequently, processors will be able to increase the volume of products they manufacture and price them more favorably for consumers.
Declines in the price of corn will also make the price of feed less volatile during the next five years since corn is a primary input into feed for livestock.
And the price of sugar is also an important commodity in several of the most profitable food-producing industries, including ice cream. It, too, is expected to be less volatile during the next five years compared to the past five.
The top-10 most profitable food industries have a risk rating ranging from low to medium-high in 2013, with an average weighted overall risk score of 4.57 out of 9 (with 9 representing the highest risk). The primary drivers affecting risk in these industries include demand from supermarkets and grocery stores and the price of commodities. Because consumers’ incomes are improving, they will be more likely to purchase goods from supermarkets and grocery stores, including discretionary goods, which is driving demand for food manufacturers.
Food processors aim to strike a balance between providing Americans with the food that they love at a reasonable price and maximizing company profitability. During the next five years, profit margins in these already-profitable food product industries are expected to expand as commodity prices become less volatile and operators cut costs associated with production. In addition, if prices do rise, they will be better able to pass off cost increases in the form of higher product prices to consumers because disposable incomes are improving in line with the economy. In particular, larger and well-established companies produce brands that millions of Americans are familiar with and loyal to. Still, Americans will look to their favorite brands to introduce healthier food products as they strive to live healthier lives. Processors that introduce and advertise healthier products are likely to be rewarded with greater sales, thus benefiting margins further.
Thanks to IBISWorld Inc., for sharing this report. For a printable PDF of the report, click HERE.
With that said, June is the perfect month to remind consumers that dairy foods are inherently healthy. Milk and other dairy foods provide nine essential nutrients.
2. Potassium: Helps to regulate the body’s fluid balance and maintain normal blood pressure, and it’s needed for muscle activity.
3. Phosphorus: Helps strengthen bones and generate energy in the body’s cells.
4. Protein: The protein in milk, yogurt and cheese builds and repairs muscle tissue, and serves as a source of energy and satiety.
5. Vitamin D: Promotes the absorption of calcium and enhances bone strength.
6. Vitamin A: Helps maintain normal vision and skin, and is important for bone growth.
7. Vitamin B-12: Helps maintain healthy red blood cells and nerve cells.
8. Riboflavin: Helps convert food into energy that the body can use and it’s important for normal eyesight and healthy skin.
9. Niacin: Helps bodies digest carbohydrates and fatty acids.
Further, according to the Midwest Dairy Council, Dairy Month is a perfect time to celebrate dairy farmers’ commitment to healthy people, healthy communities and a healthy planet! One of the greatest challenges of the next generation will be providing nutritious, affordable food to a global population expected to grow to nine billion by 2050 – while using fewer resources. Dairy is part of the solution. Not only are dairy products rich in nutrients, they are also being produced using fewer resources, helping to foster healthy people, healthy communities and a healthy planet.
Thursday, May 23, 2013
Sweeteners in Flavored Milk: The Comment Period Has Ended. Now What?
You can view the petition and comments HERE.
The petition, submitted in 2009, was in direct response to the push from federal agencies and consumer groups for lower-calorie foods and beverages to combat increases in childhood obesity. The dairy industry responded by asking for a change in the standard of identity that would provide more options for formulating lower-calorie, less-sugar flavored milk.
In February 2013, FDA finally published the petition in the Federal Register along with the agency’s request for public comment. Since, many consumer activist groups created confusion through their own interpretation of the petition, to the point that FDA felt inclined to reach out to consumers and clarify the intent of the petition in a Federal Register notice on April 15, 2013.
You can view this outreach HERE.
Here’s one example of the misconstrued message. From April 29 to May 21 (the last day to comment on the petition), the consumer watchdog organization SumOfUs.org placed ads on 15 buses in the DC metro system urging FDA to reject unlabeled aspartame in milk. The buses stopped directly in front of FDA, at a special stop provided by DC metro for FDA employees. And, according to the organization, more than 116,000 consumers had signed its petition urging FDA to reject the petition.
But here’s the deal, the petition is not about aspartame! It’s not even about ingredient disclosure. It is about nutrient content claims.
Nevertheless, this group was loud. Check out the ads HERE.
Keep milk milk
Not all comments are unfounded. The Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, formerly the American Dietetic Association, wrote a comment letter to FDA on May 21. (Talk about waiting until the last minute!) The Academy recommends FDA deny the petition for a variety of reasons, many of which are supported with literature citations. The Academy basically wants FDA to “keep milk milk.”
In its comments to FDA, the Academy suggests that the current standard of flavored milk is effective in encouraging milk consumption by school-aged children. The letter states: Flavored milk has been shown to be an effective tool in encouraging milk consumption by school-aged children; studies have demonstrated that school-aged children who drink flavored milk meet more of their nutrient needs, do not consume more added sugar, fat or calories, and are similar in weight to non-milk drinkers. Flavored milk is not a major source of added sugars for children. (Major sources include soda, fruit drinks, grain desserts, candy, dairy desserts and cold cereals).
Read the Academy’s comments to Comments to the FDA.
On Thursday morning, May 23, a mere 33 ½ hours after the comment period ended, the person in charge of reviewing those 40,649 comments addressed attendees at IDFA’s Milk & Cultured Dairy Conference in Indianapolis. “FDA will be evaluating the comments received related to the needed and appropriateness of the amendments the petition requested,” said Daniel Reese, food labeling and standards staff-Office of Nutrition, Labeling and Dietary Supplements at FDA.
In other words, the next steps are to filter out the comments based solely on emotion and unrelated noise, and review the comments that identify the pros and cons to the petition. “The petition really wants to level the playing field so that flavored milk can better compete with other lower-calorie beverages,” according to Peggy Armstrong, vice president of communications, IDFA.
She explains that the current standard requires processors to use nutrient content claims, such as “reduced-calorie,” on the front labels of flavored milk made with non-nutritive sweeteners. There are requirements to be able to call a product…any product…reduced calorie, and when it comes to flavored milk, meeting those requirements can be challenging. If those requirements are not met (see graphics), then the product would be a non-standardized beverage and could not be called milk. Dairy drink would be an option.
By allowing milk processors to use any “safe and suitable” sweetener in flavored milk and still label it “milk,” processors will be able to reduce calories and added sugars without having to go as low as is currently required for use of the nutrient content claim of “reduced calorie.”
Confusing? It can be, which is why there has been so much discussion on the petition. For more background on sweetening flavored milk, please refer to an article I recently wrote for Food Business News. It can be viewed HERE.
The fact is, allowing milk processors to use any safe and suitable sweetener in flavored milk and still label it milk would help to stem the drop in consumption, while promoting healthy eating habits that will last a lifetime. And unfortunately, one very important issue is being overlooked through all this controversy, and that is how to get kids to drink their milk. Research shows that children prefer flavored milk over plain white milk. Flavored milk requires sweetening. There are many caloric sweetening options, and a growing number of no- and low-calorie options, some of which are considered natural, such as those based on stevia plant leaf extracts. Acceptance of the proposed rule will make it easier for milk processors to blend nutritive and non-nutritive sweeteners to create flavored milks with less sugar and fewer calories.
To read more about using stevia to sweeten flavored milk, read HERE.
Check these products out
In Mexico, Hershey’s recently reformulated its ultra-pasteurized aseptic line of flavored milks to contain 25% less sugar than the original product. This low-fat milk line comes in four varieties: Chocolate, Cookies ‘N’ Cream, Strawberry and something not very common, Lactose-Free Chocolate. All varieties are enriched with “Vita 6,” a proprietary blend of six minerals and vitamins, including calcium, zinc and vitamins A, B1, B2 and E. Each 236-milliliter box contains 128 to 151 calories, depending on variety. Calories are kept low through an innovative mixture of caloric and non-caloric sweeteners, one of which is stevia.
LaLa also has a reduced-sugar, low-fat flavored aseptic milk line in Mexico that relies on stevia to keep calories low. Available in Chocolate, Strawberry and Vanilla flavors, the milk comes in 250-milliliter single-serve boxes sold in packs of three, as well as a one-liter multi-serve recloseable box. The milks are enhanced with vitamins A, D, B5, B12 and folic acid.
There are definitely pros and cons to the petition, and I would say at this point it has a 50-50 chance of being accepted. Even with that uncertainty, milk processors should be exploring ingredient technologies to lower the sugar content of their flavored milk.
Thursday, May 16, 2013
Functional Dairy Foods Are Alive and Thriving
Dairy Council of California recently held its 14th Functional Foods Task Force meeting. The task force is a group convened annually to track changes in the external environment that affect the dairy industry. This 15-member group, which I proudly am a member and have been since the beginning, is composed of industry experts from around the country, representing research and development, academia, marketing, education and communications.
Discussions ensue around nutrition and dairy research, public policy, regulations and consumer perceptions that impact dairy. Strategies are outlined that Dairy Council of California and the industry can pursue to optimize dairy’s positioning in a rapidly changing environment.
Strategies identified for the industry include:
- Ride the protein wave.
- Label products and educate consumers about milk’s nutrients beyond calcium.
- Emphasize that dairy foods belong in well-balanced vegetarian diets.
- Consider technology applications and venues to reach adolescent and young adult consumers.
- Continue to develop and market products to specific segments of the population.
- Maintain the market hold on dairy as the perfect carrier for prebiotics and probiotics.
- Develop messages around the satiety effects of dairy products.
- Support research on dairy’s role in preventing diabetes and metabolic syndrome.
- Support research on bioactive milk protein, oligosaccharides and other dairy components.
- To minimize industry-funded research bias, register trials appropriately when funding research and insist on rigorous study designs.
- Use third-party experts to increase credibility.
Thursday, May 9, 2013
The Whole Story About Dairy Is…
Most Daily Dose of Dairy™ readers are involved in the development and marketing of one or two dairy product categories. Common combinations are cheese and whey, milk and ice cream, and yogurt and dips. But we all recognize the contributions each product category makes to the overall healthful halo that dairy products possess. It is important that we occasionally do a “check in” to make sure we have not lost focus of our purpose, which should be to offer consumers the best-tasting, most nutritious, affordable and sustainable dairy products.
For long, dairy has been recognized for its nurturing and nourishing qualities. With this being Mother’s Day weekend, it is perfect timing to share this video from the Global Dairy Platform (GDP). It is less than 2.5 minutes and does a fabulous job reaffirming dairy’s role in life.
View the video HERE.
“The image of wholesome nutrition for families has been, and remains, a key to its place at the world table,” says Donald Moore, GDP executive director. “Those attributes, however, are only part of the story. Dairy plays a much larger role--in our lives and our communities--than is commonly appreciated by consumers. This is why we developed this video…to tell dairy’s whole story.”
Established in 2006, GDP’s mission is to align and support the dairy industry to promote sustainable dairy nutrition. For more information, visit HERE.
“Our members are leading dairy corporations, cooperatives and associations who have united to resolve issues affecting the future viability of the global dairy sector,” explains Moore. “The GDP and its members work to promote the nutrient richness of dairy products, bring balance and research to the role of milkfat in the diet and provide clarity on how dairy is managing its relationship with the environment. Now more than ever, as the world’s population increases by 75 million people per year, the time is right to tell the story of dairy’s power as a sustaining life force, as well as the dairy goodness we bring to billions of people every day.”
DAIRY PROTEIN: THE GOLD STANDARD. With a groundbreaking report by an Expert Consultation of the Food and Agriculture Organization of United Nations (FAO) recommending a new, advanced method for assessing the quality of dietary proteins, GDP hosted a Protein Marketing Workshop for its members to prepare and position the dairy industry to benefit from this new information. The new method—the Digestible Indispensable Amino Acid Score (DIAAS)--enables researchers to differentiate protein sources by their ability to supply amino acids for use by the body. The new method demonstrates the higher bioavailability of dairy proteins when compared to plant-based protein sources.
Data in the FAO report shows whole milk powder to have a DIAAS score of 1.22, far superior to the DIAAS score of 0.64 for peas and 0.40 for wheat. When compared to the highest refined soy isolate, dairy protein DIAAS scores were 10% to 30% higher. GDP is working in collaboration with its members to develop a strategy to communicate dairy protein’s superiority.
For more information on the FAO report, view HERE.
CHANGING THE CHEESE PARADIGM. GDP initiated a Wageningen University (Netherlands) meta-analysis of completed human clinical studies to evaluate the effects of cheese consumption on blood cholesterol levels from published clinical trials. Additionally, work on a series of animal studies and human clinical trials on the effects of cheese fat content and maturation continues to progress at the University of Copenhagen. The outcome from this research is poised to show that moderate cheese consumption does not have a negative impact on heart health.
Building on that effort, GDP serves as the secretariat to the Dairy Research Consortium (DRC), an alliance among six leading dairy industry associations that collaborates on pre-competitive research into the nutritional and health benefits of dairy. In April 2013, the DRC agreed to investigate the beneficial health outcomes related to the consumption of full-fat (whole milk) dairy products.
This is just a “skimmed” part of the “whole” story. There is so much more we are learning every day about this great food known as milk.
According to GDP, the key for dairy at this moment in its history is not to invent a new story about ourselves, but to understand where our story has taken us, how it might further unfold, and what threads unify the tale.
Please forward this blog link (below) to all your dairy industry contacts and encourage them to watch the video. Let’s collaborate and get the whole story out there. http://www.berryondairy.com/blog.html
Thursday, May 2, 2013
Coloring Dairy Foods, Naturally
In fact, numerous studies have shown that color cues for flavor. This is one of a number of reasons formulators have long added color additives to foods and beverages, including dairy. Other reasons include correcting natural variations in the actual color of certain ingredients and ensuring color during processing and storage.
(Photo source: D.D. Williamson)
If you need a refresher course on food color additive regulations in the States, scroll to the bottom of this blog, after the new product profiles for “Food Colors 101.”
Here’s the deal on adding color to foods in 2013…and beyond. It’s all about using color additives referred to as “exempt from certification,” or more casually, “natural colors.” In fact, an increasing number of dairy processors are replacing artificial colors with natural ones because of the negative publicity surrounding artificial colors.
Artificial colors have been the cause of controversy since the 1970s, when a pediatrician first identified a correlation of intake to children’s behavior. They came under fierce scrutiny again in September 2007 after the results of a British study from the University of Southampton in the United Kingdom showed a correlation between artificial food colors and additives and exacerbated hyperactive behavior in children.
Referred to as the “Southampton Six,” the colors singled out for a connection to hyperactivity in children include these three synthetics approved for use in the States: Alurra Red (FD&C 40), Tartrazine (FD&C 5) and Sunset Yellow (FD&C 6). The other three of the Southampton Six--Ponceau 4R, Quinoline Yellow and Carmoisine--have long been banned by FDA.
Color suppliers offer an array of natural replacements for the Southampton Six, as well as the other FD&C colors used in the States. (See table.) Often times a natural substitute requires careful blending of exempt-from-certification colors, as well as some minor process and formulation modifications…but it can be done! And consumer studies show that phrases such as “contains no artificial colors” or “contains no additives” appeal to a growing number of consumers.
Many dairy processors, in particular cheesemakers, have long used natural colors to liven up their products. Most cheeses are naturally the color of milk (which can be very boring) unless they include microorganisms that contribute color. An example is the mold Penicillium glaucum, which creates blue veins in gorgonzola.
Cheesemakers often add the carotenoid annatto to cheese—natural, processed and even sauces—to give it that cheesy orange color consumers, for some reason, have come to expect in their cheese. Annatto has come a long way since that first graduated cylinder of annatto was poured into a vat of milk being cooked and on its way to becoming cheddar curd. Organic versions of annatto are now available, even in water-soluble powder form, for inclusion in cheese sauce mixes and toppings.
Many natural colors are available in organic formats. Natural colors can also be designed to be oil soluble, which has long been a challenge with using natural colors in higher-fat dairy foods, such as cream cheese, dips and spreads. Today, naturally derived, oil-dispersible hues are available in colors such as brown, yellow, red, orange and even pink.
There are so many natural coloring tricks available. What’s holding you back? Look who has gone natural.
New Dairy Products Using Natural Coloring
Three of the Fruit and Milk varieties use coloring to help better convey their flavor. Strawberry relies on beet juice concentrate and turmeric oleoresin; banana uses turmeric oleoresin and annatto extract; and peach includes annatto. For more information, visit HERE.
As the only U.S. yogurt manufacturer to include vegetables in the variegate component of kids’ cup yogurt, Stonyfield shows us you can drink this great dairy + produce combo, too. New YoKids Smoothies start with a base of organic low-fat yogurt and blend in organic fruit and vegetable purees.
There are two flavor combinations and both include natural colors for visual appeal. Strawbana contains carrot, strawberry and banana purees. For color, radish and black currant juice concentrates are added. Very Berry contains sweet potato, raspberry
and strawberry purees, along with carrot juice concentrate.
For more information, visit HERE.
The cheese used to make new Mrs. Grissom’s Gourmet Smoked Gouda with Bacon Cheese Spread uses apo-carotenal to achieve its desirable cheesy hue. For more information, visit HERE.
Dean Foods’ TruMoo Strawberry flavored milk uses beet juice powder to enhance the strawberry color.
For more information, visit HERE.
Stay tuned for more on this product when it is featured as a Daily Dose of Dairy.
Food Colors 101
The term color additive is legally defined in Title 21, Part 70 of the Code of Federal Regulations (21 CFR 70). Basically, any ingredient with the sole purpose of adding color to a food or beverage is a color additive, with all color additives requiring approval by FDA as a food additive.
In the U.S., synthetic food colors are classified by FDA as color additives subject to certification (21 CFR 74). They are certified with an FD&C number. This indicates that the additive has been tested for safety and is approved for used in foods, drugs and cosmetics, or FD&C. Seven colors were initially approved under the Pure Food and Drug Act of 1906. Over time, several have been delisted and replaced. Today there are still seven, which can be combined into an infinite number of colors; hence, the seven are considered primary colors.
The seven synthetics are further classified as standardized dyes or lakes. Dyes are a concentrated source of color and are water soluble and oil insoluble. Lakes, on the other hand, are made by combining dyes with salts to make them water-insoluble compounds. Thus, they are best described as providing color by dispersion. Lakes are considered to be more stable than dyes and are ideal for coloring products that either contain fat or lack sufficient moisture to dissolve dyes.
FDA also provides a list of color additives that are exempt from certification (21 CFR 73). By default, these colors are often characterized as natural but FDA does not consider any color added to as food unless the color is natural to the product itself. For example, consumers expect strawberry milk to have a red hue. If strawberry juice is added for color, and providing that none of the other ingredients in the milk were characterized as artificial, this product could be labeled “all-natural strawberry milk.” Such a description is not possible if beet juice, an FDA-recognized exempt-from-certification color additive, is used for a colorful boost. What is appropriate to say is “does not contain any artificial colors.”
In general, artificial colorings are manufactured from petroleum-based raw materials. Colors exempt from certification are obtained from a variety of sources, including plants, minerals, insects and fermentation, resources considered by many to be natural.
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)